Sunday, May 1, 2016

Succinct Summation of Week’s Events 4.29.16 (plus Prince's (non) will)

This is one of the most extensive summary lists of the week's events I've seen since I've been doing this blog.  But with nine positives and nine negatives, at least it's balanced.   The most encouraging positive is that Japan's new negative interest rate policy (that is when the government charges you for saving) hasn't worked out so well so it's not likely other countries, let alone Uncle Sam, will be following suit.  The most encouraging negative is consumer confidence down to 89.0, but it was expected to be 90.0 and that ain't much of a decline.  This Sunday's bonus is an article from today's Washington Post about the nightmare being created by the negligence of rock star Prince to make a will.  The moral for the day:  everybody needs a will because nobody knows when they're going to go.  The headaches that will encumber your heirs if you fail to leave a will are beyond description.  So if you don't have one, get to it.  That is the sort of advice any CFP would give you, so why not this CFP-in-training?  Hope everyone had a great weekend!


Succinct Summation of Week’s Events 4.29.16


Succinct Summation of Week’s Events for the week ending April 29, 2016:

Positives:

1) Initial jobless claims totaled 257k, 2k less than expected and off last week’s 248k which was the lowest since 1973. The 4 week average moves down by 5k to 256k while continuing claims fell by another 5k.
2) The market had its temper tantrum but the BoJ saw what happened after the late January move to negative interest rates, and decided to fight off the massive peer pressure to ease again, for now.
3) US personal income in March rose .4% m/o/m, one tenth above the estimate but given back by a one tenth downward revision in February. The y/o/y gain of 4.2% was positively driven by private sector wages and salaries which rose at a 5.1% y/o/y pace, the best since August ’15.
4) Personal spending was a hair better if we take the one tenth miss in March with the one tenth upward revision to February and January. The m/o/m gain though was just .1% after .2% gains in the two prior months. These are nominal numbers.
5) As measured by the PCE, headline inflation rose .1% m/o/m and a benign .8% y/o/y while the core rate clocked in at .1% m/o/m also but 1.6% y/o/y. Both were in line with expectations. The spread between core CPI and core PCE remains a wide 6 tenths due to the different weights on housing and healthcare.
6) Contract signings of existing homes in March rose 1.4% m/o/m, above the estimate of a gain of .5% and follows a 3.4% rise in February (revised down by one tenth). The headline index is back to where it was last May. The NAR though had this caveat with the sales decline out West: “the median home price has risen an astonishing 38% in the past three years… driving up prices beyond what a growing share of households can comfortably afford.”
7) Markit services PMI for April was 52.1, up from 51.3 in March, 49.7 in February and vs 53.2 in January. The six month average is now 52.8 vs the 12 month average of 54.1. Notwithstanding the survey bounce in April, “Survey respondents suggested that subdued client demand and less favorable underlying economic conditions had weighed on business activity at their units in April. Reflecting this, latest data signaled only a marginal rebound in new business growth from the survey record low recorded in March.”
8) April Richmond manufacturing survey fell 8 pts to +14 but that was 2 pts better than expected and the 2 nd best print since October ’14.
9) New home sales in March totaled 511k, 9k less than expected but February was revised up by 7k to 519k and January was revised higher by 19k to 521k. Months’ supply rose to 5.8 from 5.6 and that is the most since September ’15 and is essentially back to the 30 year average. Home prices fell 1.8% y/o/y to $288,000.

Negatives:

1) Following the FOMC meeting, the Fed has made it even more confusing as to what data they are most dependent on in developing policy.
2) The US economy grew by just .5% q/o/q annualized in Q1, two tenths less than expected, down from 1.4% in Q4 and vs the average in 2015 of about 2%. As the price deflator rose .7%, two tenths more than expected, nominal GDP growth was actually in line at an anemic 1.2%. The y/o/y real growth rate was 2% off an easy comparison.
3) March durable goods orders ex transports fell .2% m/o/m vs the estimate of a gain of .5%. The core rate of spend was flat m/o/m, six tenths weaker than expected and February was revised down by two tenths. Core shipments were up just .3% rather than the forecasted .9%. The absolute level of core capital spending in March was $66.9B vs $68b in December 2011. This level was also seen in 2000 and in 2006.
4) The April Chicago manufacturing index fell to 50.4 from 53.6 in March. That is below the estimate of 52.6 and compares with the 3 month average of 50.5 and 6 month average of 49.6. MNI said the m/o/m drop was “led by a fall in New Orders and a sharp drop in Order Backlogs. It marks a slow start to the 2 nd quarter, with most measures down from levels seen a year earlier.” The employment component fell back below 50.
5) Final print on UoM April consumer confidence fell to 89 from the first read of 89.7 and down from 91 in March. It’s the weakest figure since September ’15 and is below the estimate of 90. The components however were mixed as Current Conditions rose 1.3 pts from March while Expectations fell a sharper 3.9 pts. Also of note, inflation expectations ticked up by one tenth to 2.8%, the most since September ’15.
6) April Conference Board consumer confidence index fell two pts to 94.2 and that was below the estimate of 95.8 and brings the six month average to 95.2 and the 12 month average to 96.6. The two main components were mixed as the Present Situation rose by 1.5 pts while Expectations fell to the lowest level since February ’14. The answers to the labor market questions were very mixed.
7) In the all important Spring selling season, the MBA said mortgage applications to buy a home fell 2.4% w/o/w and the y/o/y gain slowed to 14.5% vs 17% last week and 24% in the week prior. Applications to refi fell 5% w/o/w but after three weeks of good gains. The y/o/y rise is 12%.
8) The US Q1 Employment Cost Index was up by .6% q/o/q, in line with expectations while the prior quarter was revised down by one tenth to a rise of .5%. Looking specifically at private sector wages and salaries saw a .7% q/o/q increase, matching the biggest gain since June ’14 but the y/o/y gain was just 2%, the slowest since June ’15. On a cost per hour basis, wage growth remained modest in Q1.
9) The German IFO business confidence index for April was essentially unchanged at 106.6 vs 106.7 last month. That was .5 pt below the estimate and compares with the six month average of 107.4 and the 12 month average of 107.8. The Current Assessment component was down slightly while Expectations were up a touch. IFO was sanguine on the data by saying “The mood in the German economy remains positive…The moderate upturn in the German economy continues.”

 King-Sized Mistake Could Cost Prince Estate Millions - The Big Picture

King-Sized Mistake Could Cost Prince Estate Millions


wapo

My Sunday Washington Post Business Section column is out. Given the apparent lack of a will governing the Prince estate, we look at some basics that everyoneshould do, regardless of portfolio size or income.

The editors asked me for some headline suggestions, and we spitballed a few. Most readers probably don’t realize that writers don’t headline their own column; thats done by the editors, and I appreciate the opportunity for providing input.
I don’t love what the print edition used; here were a few suggestions we kicked around:

– King-Sized Mistake Could Cost Prince Estate $100s of Millions
– I Would Die 4 U (but not before getting a Will)
– You might not have Prince’s ‘Diamonds & Pearls’ — but you should have a will
– You might not have Prince’s ‘Pop Life’ — but you should have a will
– Death is inevitable; we need a plan for it (is the actual header on the inside jump page)

The column suggests 5 simple steps everyone should take to avoid causing confusion and mayhem when you inevitably take your final bow. Have a Will, Use TOD Account titles, have a family meeting, make a financial plan, etc. Its straightforward, but overlooked advice:

Family meeting: Have a conversation with loved ones about all of your intentions — not just about your assets. It’s also about other end-of-life issues. You should have a “living will” for medical directives (i.e., “do not resuscitate” if you don’t want life-prolonging measures), as well as a durable power of attorney for health care (in case you are incapacitated but medical decisions must be made). You can also create a power of attorney for financial matters for those circumstances where you become incapacitated. Determine who will be the executor of your estate and, if you have children under 18, who will become their guardian.”

Sure, its not the most fun family discussion — but its important nonetheless. Do it, and get it over with.

Barry Ritholtz
Washington Post, May 1 2016
http://wapo.st/1X0vpQT

No comments:

Post a Comment