Historical
Cycles Disagree With Wall Street
By Dave Moenning on Jan 10, 2023 09:16 am
In last week's meandering market missive, I opined that
analysts of all shapes and sizes were pretty much singing the same song
right now regarding the outlook for the economy, inflation, corporate
earnings, and in turn, the stock market.
To review, I wrote... The refrain goes something
like this. The economy is slowing. The Fed refuses to back away from their
aggressive stance (I.E. Powell & Co., as well as many other global
central bankers, continue to talk tough). Inflation remains too high. And
as such, the Fed is about to make a "policy error" by going too
far, which, history shows they almost always do. This will, as we're told,
most certainly push the economy into recession.
Further, the negative Nancy's of the street contend that the
market has not yet discounted such an event. As such, earnings estimates
are too high and MUST come down - substantially. Joy.
And in looking at the various forecasts Wall Street analysts
feel compelled to provide for the stock market each year, the song remains
the same. In short, a lot of analysts believe that stocks will fall in the
first half of the year and will then rally in the back half. Once the Fed
relents, of course.
There are any number of reasons and/or historical analogs
provided to support this view. Frankly, the evidence is tough to argue with
as the situation looks clear. And everyone agrees.
Whether you agree or disagree with the narrative that stocks
must go lower doesn't really matter. It is important to recognize that
there are times in this game when the prophecies offered up become
self-fulfilling. So, with everybody sporting their bear hats at the present
time, one of my biggest concerns is that traders will simply stick to the
script and keep selling at every turn.
Now For The Good News
Long-time readers know that I like to check in with
something called the Cycle Composite from time to time to see how stocks
are acting relative to their historical trends.
As a reminder, the Cycle Composite was developed and maintained
by the good folks at Ned Davis Research Group. They take the price action
from all the 1-year seasonal, 4-year Presidential, and 10-year decennial
cycles from 1900 and throw them into the computer. The cycles are then
mashed up to create a projection for what a calendar year might look like.
Although I don't believe in making predictions, I admit that
the action in the stock market oftentimes rhymes beautifully with its
historical tendencies. And yet, there are also times when stocks go their
own way due to the inputs du jour, rendering the Cycle Composite's
projection almost useless.
But as I've said a time or twenty over the years, when
stocks are in sync with the historical cycles, the projection provided can
be good. As in, scary good.
So, imagine my surprise when I pulled up the new Cycle
Composite projection for 2023 shown below.
View Chart
Online
Image Source: Ned Davis Research Group
Interesting, eh? Instead of confirming the consensus view
that stocks have nowhere to go but down, the historical cycles suggest that
investors should hop onboard the bull train - and fast. Instead of moving
down on fears of how the Fed is going to wreck the economy, the cycles are
pointing up and to the right from now through mid-summer. And then higher
still into the fourth quarter. Hmmm...
While I do NOT manage money based on projections, views, gut
hunches, or even phases of the moon, I found this to be a bit of an
eye-opener - and I wanted to share.
So, will this year's stock market adventure become the
self-fulling prophecy professed by the majority of analysts or something
completely different?
Will stocks start declining again on the idea that the
economy and earnings are in trouble? Or head higher as the much feared and
overly predicted recession fails to materialize?
As you might have guessed, I have no answers here. But the
fact that history suggest a completely different outcome that what is
expected by the masses right now is certainly food for thought.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment